Showing posts with label management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label management. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Performance Improvement Tip of the Day: "Outcomes Driven" Meeting Agenda

The meeting agenda is probably one of the most commonly used tools in project management. However, how this tool is used can make a big difference in the effectiveness of meetings, as well as the coordination of the overall performance improvement project.

The "Outcomes Driven Meeting Agenda" template below integrates performance-enhancing features into the staid meeting agenda in order to create a powerful project management tool:
  • "Roles" of team members - Leader, Facilitator, Scribe, and Time Keeper - are assigned at the outset in order to keep the agenda flowing. 
  • "Time" is allotted for each agenda item in order to guide the discussion, and to keep the team from getting "stuck" on a particular item. 
  • "Discussion Type" is a unique element that allows the team to know what the nature of the discussion will be, so that the discussion is more directed. 
    • Info = Share Information 
    • Proc = Process Information 
    • Con = Need Consensus 
    • Dec = Make Decision 
  • "Desired Discussion Outcomes" is my favorite feature in this tool. It allows the project leaders to envision and lead the team to the desired outcome for each agenda topic. 

Monday, October 31, 2011

How to Address Cleanliness Violations at Hospital? New Building or Performance Improvement

The LA Times posted this article about UCLA Harbor Medical Center's safety violations stemming from "lack of cleanliness".

The plan for correction: "Los Angeles County is spending nearly $323 million to construct a 190,000-square-foot building at the hospital that will replace both the surgical facilities and the emergency room. "

As some of the comments to the story point out, its not all about the facility - its also about management and leadership. I've worked with organizations that have faced even older infrastructure, and yet we have improved their cleanliness with good old fashioned management and systems:

  • Leadership recognized the difficult situation but resolved to address it.
  • Management threw its shoulder "to the flywheel" and made it turn.
    • A voluntary team of "cleanliness inspectors" toured the hospital on a regular basis and documented cleanliness of high risk areas - in a manner that could be measured, easily disseminated, and compared.
  • Performance improvement systems were installed to ensure improvement:
    • Pulled together a "performance improvement team" to oversee the issue.
    • Measured the results.
    • Made the measurement consistent and reliable.
    • Disseminated the findings.
    • Developed policies for cleanliness that could be adhered to by all.
    • Ensured accountability by reporting on the team's findings to the governing body through the appropriate oversight committees.
    • Made the "clicks of the fly wheel visible to all" by showing that some departments (that were just as resource-starved as the others) were able to make improvements.
Perhaps a new building is necessary at UCLA Harbor for many reasons, but in order to reform healthcare, we as a society have to start recognizing that adding costs (staffing, equipment, and buildings) to solve a problem are not sustainable interventions. Improving leadership, management, and systems are.


ADDENDUM 11/1/11: This story published subsequently in the Daily Breeze provides further details about a corrective action plan being put into place at UCLA Harbor. "Those fixes include a reorganization and restructuring of the hospital's infection prevention and control unit, identifying problems with the physical plant and enhancing efforts to assure staff members are washing their hands and practicing good hygiene." All of these actions appear to be appropriate, however, the key to real and sustained improvement from the "corrective action plan" is to ensure that the actions are monitored regularly, and that comprehensive performance improvement systems are implemented.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Performance Improvement Tip of the Day: Culture Drives Performance

The culture of an organization determines behavior, decision-making, and ultimately outcomes. It is "baked into the design" of every (clinical) process. Therefore, in order to improve outcomes, one must understand and shape culture. This requires intricate analysis, leadership support, and a broad enough span of time to accomplish the changes required.

Within the context of most performance improvement projects, we generally think about operating "within the cultural paradigm" of the institution, otherwise many targeted interventions may get rejected by the organization.

However, in order to achieve "breakthrough performance", the organization's culture has to be changed as it is in large part the culture that is constraining outcomes. Thus, performance improvement specialists have to be adept at gauging what "cultural change" they can successfully advocate for and implement within the course of their projects in order to lead the organization to higher-level performance.

"Culture" makes its presence felt in many subtle ways. Even in the "simple" case of implementing order sets, the following are variants of interventions that can be implemented based upon "what the organization's culture is ready to handle":
  • use of order sets 
  • mandating use of order sets 
  • implementation of "opt out" orders 
  • use of nurse or therapist-driven protocols 
  • pharmacist or nurse "pulling the chain" to stop the process for any unclear orders
This blog from Ron Ashkenas on HBR Blog Network presents a nice, concise analysis of culture, its impact on performance, and a few tips on how to assess culture:

"Any management team can assess its culture by asking these kinds of simple questions across a range of organizational behaviors. For example: To what extent do we reward individual vs. team results? To what extent do we share information broadly or parcel it out narrowly? To what extent do we encourage or discourage risk?"

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Linking Greatness - Structures within Structures

At a recent discussion about applying "Good to Great" principles at our institution, one our our department leaders talked about a sophisticated structure he had built up over the years to identify and develop talent within his department. He described as a "hierarchical" model, which moved talented individuals from "field staff" to "leaders" to "gold badges". It was clearly well thought through, disciplined, and understood by all members of his department.

The key points that generated from this discussion were:
  • did this structure enable this department to move down the path of "greatness"? how would he know?
  • this structure clearly allowed him to identify the good players, however, did it help him to identify the "ones who should not be on the bus"?
  • and, by the same token, did the structure help him to "move the wrong people off the bus"?
Moreover, it was quite likely that this was the only department in the institution that had set up such a structure raising further questions of:
  • should this model be emulated by other departments?
  • what is the impact to the drive for greatness to have different such structures within different departments?
Questions like these allow us as managers to dive deeper into our constructs and understand better how to connect our work with the overall work of an institution and to ensure that our department-specific activities are helping to drive the overall institution to greatness.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Reform Management to Reform Healthcare

a compelling article discussing why current healthcare reform proposals are unlikely to yield real results .. not enough real innovation and performance improvement at the front line ..

Target antiquated management methods

By John Kenagy
Posted: October 15, 2009 - 11:00 am EDT

Everyone who has worked in a large, complex organization has run up against unmanageable “elephants in the room”—unresolved issues, major inconsistencies, or big problems that no one in the room can even acknowledge, let alone solve.

In my career, I have been a physician, healthcare executive and adviser, academic scholar, author and, perhaps most importantly, a patient once deeply immersed in healthcare with a critical injury. In each of those roles, I have seen big elephants in many rooms.

As a visiting scholar at Harvard Business School, I studied those few companies that innovated successfully when others failed to adapt, and discovered one of the most consistent indicators of success is the ability to turn unacknowledged elephants into real opportunities.

Advertisement | Your Ad Here





For example, Intel saw its profit fall from $198 million in 1984 to $2 million in 1985, but then regained dominance. How? CEO Andy Grove famously identified Intel's elephant and turned it into an opportunity. Grove recognized he had successfully developed, led and grown a great computer memory company whose business model was no longer relevant in the marketplace. Rather than ignore this elephant and stay alive by downsizing and cost cutting, he identified it as an opportunity, marshaled his organization's forces, and adapted Intel's business model to a profitable focus on microprocessors.

Meanwhile, Digital Equipment Co. (DEC), another great technology company, saw its profits fall dramatically at exactly the same time, but failed to eliminate the elephant in the room. A Microsoft executive, who was formerly part of DEC's senior management team, told me this story: “I saw it happen. We formed consensus around the management table on key strategic initiatives over and over again while many around the table were thinking, ‘Here we go again, this is not going to work.' ” No one could acknowledge, or manage, the fact that DEC's previously successful business model was the problem. That's the elephant that killed DEC.

Fortunately, the key to reforming healthcare does not require eliminating a herd of elephants that silently stampede through many healthcare organizations. It requires eliminating only one—but it is a very big elephant.

Elephant No. 1 is the belief that we can transform healthcare with formerly successful, but now antiquated management methods that were originally designed for mid-20th century factories, not 21st century healthcare. “Try harder” is not the solution; it's part of the problem.



For example, let's look at the healthcare reform solutions proffered to Congress in the last few months. They generally follow this pattern: First gather and analyze the data, then assemble experts in meeting rooms to design and implement solutions and technology that “simplify administrative costs, develop new kinds of healthcare insurance, make hospitals and doctors more efficient, reduce hospitalizations, manage chronic illnesses more effectively and improve healthcare information technology.”

Data up to more meetings, then implement more solutions and technology down. Sound familiar? I've been in healthcare for 40 years and, for me, it's as Yogi Berra said: “Deja vu all over again.”

Just like DEC, we are not going to transform healthcare by trying harder with 1978 methods. Trying harder to move more data up to more experts in more meetings, who will then design and implement more solutions and technology down to the frontline, will deliver exactly what it has already delivered—less care at more cost. That's our Elephant No. 1.

Acknowledging Elephant No. 1 reframes the problem and the opportunity. Our dilemma is not a lack of technology, money, or effort by intelligent, hard-working people, and it's certainly not a shortage of meetings. It is a data up/implement down, industrial management model that has been overwhelmed by the complex, dynamic, unpredictable nature of 21st century healthcare. Our current system is not dysfunctional or broken. It delivers all it can.

Looking at business models and methods that successfully manage complex, unpredictable work delivers the solution. My Harvard Business School research and experience in the crucible of healthcare's frontline developed, tested and validated an “adaptive design” business model of innovation that eliminates Elephant No. 1.

The successful path is well-documented. Instead of moving information up to meeting rooms, a few leaders will use adaptive design methods to develop, coordinate and control new critical thinking skills and rapid, state-of-the-art decisionmaking close to the point of care.

The result? People and systems that address problems as they happen and then test, validate and replicate solutions in real time close to the patient. Everyone works every day to increasingly get patients exactly what they need at continually lower cost. Everyone is fixing healthcare.

Using the inspiration of adaptive design methods, skills and tools, a Massachusetts hospital increased surgical volume by 16% while decreasing surgical staff overtime by 14%; a Minnesota hospital nursing unit yielded a total return on investment of $1.7 million and at the same time won the award for most improved patient satisfaction in a 17-hospital system; and a Colorado hospital pharmacy generated $1.9 million straight to the bottom line by making it simpler for patients to get the medications they needed.

New adaptive design ideas—ideas that don't just try harder at old solutions—eliminate Elephant No. 1 and open the door to the true transformation of healthcare.

For example, innovation incubators inside frontline units always rapidly problem solve and simplify the work. That creates the opportunity to partner with technology companies to bring new, simple, testable and improvable enabling technologies into these frontline incubators as experiments. These new partnerships will then test, validate, improve, collect and disseminate the lessons learned to the broader healthcare community.

The broader community is now ready to learn because a few leading organizations have eliminated Elephant No. 1. They are developing people to get patients exactly what they need at continually lower cost in real time, not in meetings. That's the way to fix healthcare.

John Kenagy is a former visiting scholar at Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass.